← console
voxell vciy

CVE-2026-42587: Netty: HttpContentDecompressor maxAllocation bypass via Content-Encoding: br/zstd/snappy enables decompression bomb DoS

ROUTINE

Telemetry drift only. No threshold crossed and no authority ruling changed.

CVE record, CISA KEV and EPSS as of 2026-10-18.

CVEs like this one computed, by meaning

What to do now held facts and links

  1. Upgrade to the fixed version for your release line, or later: netty 4.1.133; netty 4.2.13 upper bounds of the CVE record's affected ranges
  2. Later advisories still cover the fixes above and name higher ones: netty-codec-http 4.2.15.Final (CVE-2026-50020), 4.2.16.Final (CVE-2026-55831), 4.2.16.Final (CVE-2026-55833), 4.2.16.Final (CVE-2026-56745), 4.2.16.Final (CVE-2026-56746), 4.2.16.Final (CVE-2026-59898), 4.2.16.Final (CVE-2026-59899), 4.2.16.Final (CVE-2026-59921), 4.2.17.Final (CVE-2026-59903) OSV advisories
  3. Record your decision, dated and frozen with today's evidence: patch by a date · mitigated by a compensating control · deferred · accepted the risk · not affected
  4. Check your version against the ranges this record publishes.

What it is stated by the CNA

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final, HttpContentDecompressor accepts a maxAllocation parameter to limit decompression buffer size and prevent decompression bomb attacks. This limit is correctly enforced for gzip and deflate encodings via ZlibDecoder, but is silently ignored when the content encoding is br (Brotli), zstd, or snappy. An attacker can bypass the configured decompression limit by sending a compressed payload with Content-Encoding: br instead of Content-Encoding: gzip, causing unbounded memory allocation and out-of-memory denial of service. The same vulnerability exists in DelegatingDecompressorFrameListener for HTTP/2 connections. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.13.Final and 4.1.133.Final.

weakness
CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
affected
netty; io.netty netty-codec-http; io.netty netty-codec-http2
published ranges
netty < 4.1.133; netty >= 4.2.0 < 4.2.13
first unaffected version, by branch
netty 4.1.133; netty 4.2.13
fixed by package (from OSV advisories)
io.netty:netty-codec-http (Maven): 4.1.133.Final; 4.2.13.Final GHSA-f6hv-jmp6-3vwvio.netty:netty-codec-http2 (Maven): 4.1.133.Final; 4.2.13.Final GHSA-f6hv-jmp6-3vwv
later fixes (from OSV advisories)
netty-codec-http 4.1.133.Final is inside a range CVE-2026-50020 (GHSA-hvcg-qmg6-jm4c) lists as affected. That advisory is fixed in 4.1.135.Final.netty-codec-http 4.1.133.Final is inside a range CVE-2026-55831 (GHSA-6jqx-86gh-f27w) lists as affected. That advisory is fixed in 4.1.136.Final.netty-codec-http 4.1.133.Final is inside a range CVE-2026-55833 (GHSA-mvh2-crg5-v77c) lists as affected. That advisory is fixed in 4.1.136.Final.netty-codec-http 4.1.133.Final is inside a range CVE-2026-56745 (GHSA-jppx-w49h-x2qq) lists as affected. That advisory is fixed in 4.1.136.Final.netty-codec-http 4.1.133.Final is inside a range CVE-2026-56746 (GHSA-6cqp-g7gg-8hr5) lists as affected. That advisory is fixed in 4.1.136.Final.netty-codec-http 4.1.133.Final is inside a range CVE-2026-59898 (GHSA-4mp9-239f-g9hg) lists as affected. That advisory is fixed in 4.1.136.Final.
severity
7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
assigned by
GitHub_M
published
2026-05-13

check us github.com

Exploit code held, dated

exploit code
None held in the PoC-in-GitHub feed. A public repository changes this brief.

What moved held, dated

dateEPSSevent
14 May 20260.0004
18 May 20260.00042
19 May 20260.00055
22 May 20260.00018
14 Jun 20260.00019
15 Jun 20260.00525scoring model v2026.06.15
23 Jun 20260.00545
30 Jun 20260.00748
4 Jul 20260.00863
10 Jul 20260.00887
22 Jul 20260.00921
24 Jul 20260.0099
28 Sep 20260.01046

13 observations held. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the measurement was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed.

Outside the record researched, cited

This section reads the record's references and adds cited findings from outside it. It needs an account. Everything above is held facts and is complete without it.

Sign in to add the researched section

What would change this brief held, dated

CISA KEV
Not listed in the catalogue we hold. A listing changes this brief.
exploit probability
0.01 on 2026-09-28 (FIRST's EPSS, a probability and not evidence of exploitation). Next band line: 10% (0.10). Crossing a line changes this brief.
fix
Held: netty 4.1.133; netty 4.2.13. A newer fix from the CNA or OSV changes this brief.

Watch this CVE What counts as a move

How to check this

Every value above is held with two dates: when it was true upstream (as_of) and when we recorded it (tx_from). Re-derive the exploit probability as it stood on any date:

SELECT value, source, source_version, as_of, tx_from
FROM volatile_valid_as_of('CVE-2026-42587', '2026-10-30T23:59:59.999999Z', now());