CVE-2026-41713: Prompt Injection via Memory Poisoning in PromptChatMemoryAdvisor
Telemetry drift only. No threshold crossed and no authority ruling changed.
CVE record, CISA KEV and EPSS as of 2026-10-18.
CVEs like this one computed, by meaning
What to do now held facts and links
- Upgrade to the fixed version for your release line, or later: 1.0.7; 1.1.6 CVE record
- Record your decision, dated and frozen with today's evidence: patch by a date · mitigated by a compensating control · deferred · accepted the risk · not affected
- Check your version against the ranges this record publishes.
What it is stated by the CNA
A malicious user could craft input that is stored in conversation memory and later interpreted by the model in an unintended way. Applications using the affected advisor with user-controlled input may be susceptible to manipulation of model behavior across conversation turns.
- weakness
- CWE-1336 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine
- affected
- VMware Spring AI
- published ranges
- vmware spring ai >= 1.0.0 < 1.0.7; vmware spring ai >= 1.1.0 < 1.1.6
- fixed in
- 1.0.7; 1.1.6
- fixed by package (from OSV advisories)
- org.springframework.ai:spring-ai-client-chat (Maven): 1.0.7; 1.1.6 GHSA-5852-phmh-8fhr
- severity
- 8.2 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
- assigned by
- vmware
- published
- 2026-05-12
check us spring.io nvd.nist.gov
Exploit code held, dated
- exploit code
- None held in the PoC-in-GitHub feed. A public repository changes this brief.
What moved held, dated
| date | EPSS | event |
|---|---|---|
| 12 May 2026 | 0.00033 | |
| 13 May 2026 | 0.00031 | |
| 18 May 2026 | 0.00041 | |
| 22 May 2026 | 0.00042 | |
| 13 Jun 2026 | 0.00049 | |
| 15 Jun 2026 | 0.00218 | scoring model v2026.06.15 |
| 28 Sep 2026 | 0.00352 |
7 observations held. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the measurement was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed.
Outside the record researched, cited
This section reads the record's references and adds cited findings from outside it. It needs an account. Everything above is held facts and is complete without it.
What would change this brief held, dated
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in the catalogue we hold. A listing changes this brief.
- exploit probability
- 0.00 on 2026-09-28 (FIRST's EPSS, a probability and not evidence of exploitation). Next band line: 10% (0.10). Crossing a line changes this brief.
- fix
- Held: 1.0.7; 1.1.6. A newer fix from the CNA or OSV changes this brief.
How to check this
Every value above is held with two dates: when it was true upstream (as_of) and when we recorded it (tx_from). Re-derive the exploit probability as it stood on any date:
SELECT value, source, source_version, as_of, tx_from
FROM volatile_valid_as_of('CVE-2026-41713', '2026-10-29T23:59:59.999999Z', now());