CVE-2021-40830: Inconsistent CA override function behavior within AWS IoT Device SDKs on Unix systems
Telemetry drift only. No threshold crossed and no authority ruling changed.
CVE record, CISA KEV and EPSS as of 2026-10-18.
CVEs like this one computed, by meaning
What to do now held facts and links
- Upgrade to the fixed version for your release line, or later: 1.5.0; 1.6.1; 1.12.7; 1.5.3 CVE record
- Later advisories still cover the fixes above and name higher ones: awsiotsdk 1.7.0 (CVE-2021-40831) OSV advisories
- Record your decision, dated and frozen with today's evidence: patch by a date · mitigated by a compensating control · deferred · accepted the risk · not affected
- Check your version against the ranges this record publishes.
What it is stated by the CNA
The AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Java, Python, C++ and Node.js appends a user supplied Certificate Authority (CA) to the root CAs instead of overriding it on Unix systems. TLS handshakes will thus succeed if the peer can be verified either from the user-supplied CA or the system’s default trust-store. Attackers with access to a host’s trust stores or are able to compromise a certificate authority already in the host's trust store (note: the attacker must also be able to spoof DNS in this case) may be able to use this issue to bypass CA pinning. An attacker could then spoof the MQTT broker, and either drop traffic and/or respond with the attacker's data, but they would not be able to forward this data on to the MQTT broker because the attacker would still need the user's private keys to authenticate against the MQTT broker. …
- weakness
- The AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Java, Python, C++ and Node.js appends a user supplied Certificate Authority (CA) to the root CAs instead of overriding it on Unix systems. TLS handshakes will thus succeed if the peer can be verified either from the user-supplied CA or the system’s default trust-store. Attackers with access to a host’s trust stores or are able to compromise a certificate authority already in the host's trust store (note: the attacker must also be able to spoof DNS in this case) may be able to use this issue to bypass CA pinning. An attacker could then spoof the MQTT broker, and either drop traffic and/or respond with the attacker's data, but they would not be able to forward this data on to the MQTT broker because the attacker would still need the user's private keys to authenticate against the MQTT broker.
- affected
- Amazon Web Services AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Java; Amazon Web Services AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Python; Amazon Web Services AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for C++; Amazon Web Services AWS IoT Device SDK v2 for Node.js; Amazon Web Services AWS-C-IO
- published ranges
- amazon web services aws-c-io 0.10.4; amazon web services internet of things device software development kit v2 < 1.5.0; amazon web services internet of things device software development kit v2 < 1.5.3; amazon web services internet of things device software development kit v2 < 1.6.1; and 1 more on the CVE page
- fixed in
- 1.5.0; 1.6.1; 1.12.7; 1.5.3
- fixed by package (from OSV advisories)
- software.amazon.awssdk.iotdevicesdk:aws-iot-device-sdk (Maven): 1.5.0 GHSA-c4rh-4376-gff4awsiotsdk (PyPI): 1.6.1 GHSA-c4rh-4376-gff4 PYSEC-2021-863aws-iot-device-sdk-v2 (npm): 1.5.3 GHSA-c4rh-4376-gff4
- later fixes (from OSV advisories)
- awsiotsdk 1.6.1 is inside a range CVE-2021-40831 (GHSA-j3f7-7rmc-6wqj) lists as affected. That advisory is fixed in 1.7.0.aws-iot-device-sdk-v2 1.5.3 is inside a range CVE-2021-40831 (GHSA-j3f7-7rmc-6wqj) lists as affected. That advisory is fixed in 1.6.0.
- severity
- 6.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- assigned by
- F-SecureUS
- published
- 2021-11-22
check us github.com github.com github.com github.com
Exploit code held, dated
- exploit code
- None held in the PoC-in-GitHub feed. A public repository changes this brief.
What moved held, dated
| date | EPSS | event |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Nov 2021 | 0.01324 | |
| 6 Jan 2022 | 0.0568 | |
| 4 Feb 2022 | 0.01787 | |
| 1 Apr 2022 | 0.01018 | |
| 7 Mar 2023 | 0.00074 | scoring model v2023.03.01 |
| 17 Mar 2025 | 0.00102 | scoring model v2025.03.14 |
| 29 Mar 2025 | 0.00257 | |
| 30 Mar 2025 | 0.00103 | |
| 15 Jun 2026 | 0.00375 | scoring model v2026.06.15 |
| 15 Sep 2026 | 0.00387 |
18 observations held. A step marked with a scoring model moved because the measurement was replaced, not because the vulnerability changed.
Outside the record researched, cited
This section reads the record's references and adds cited findings from outside it. It needs an account. Everything above is held facts and is complete without it.
What would change this brief held, dated
- CISA KEV
- Not listed in the catalogue we hold. A listing changes this brief.
- exploit probability
- 0.00 on 2026-09-15 (FIRST's EPSS, a probability and not evidence of exploitation). Next band line: 10% (0.10). Crossing a line changes this brief.
- fix
- Held: 1.5.0; 1.6.1; 1.12.7; 1.5.3. A newer fix from the CNA or OSV changes this brief.
How to check this
Every value above is held with two dates: when it was true upstream (as_of) and when we recorded it (tx_from). Re-derive the exploit probability as it stood on any date:
SELECT value, source, source_version, as_of, tx_from
FROM volatile_valid_as_of('CVE-2021-40830', '2026-10-29T23:59:59.999999Z', now());